Title V MCH Block Grant Program Guide

Everything state MCH directors, local health department staff, and program managers need to know about the Title V Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant — from eligibility and the TVIS application to performance measures, budget set-asides, and common compliance pitfalls.

What Is the Title V MCH Block Grant?

The Title V Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant, cataloged as CFDA 93.994, is the oldest federal-state partnership for promoting and protecting the health of mothers, children, and families in the United States. Authorized under Title V of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 701-710), the program has operated continuously since 1935 — making it one of the longest-running public health programs in American history.

Unlike competitive federal grants where organizations submit applications through Grants.gov and are scored against other applicants, Title V operates as a formula-based block grant. Congress appropriates funds to the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) within the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and MCHB distributes those funds to 59 states and jurisdictions — all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and 8 U.S. territories and freely associated states — based on a statutory formula.

For FY2024, the federal Title V appropriation was approximately $815 million. When combined with the required state match (at least $3 state/local for every $4 federal), the total investment in maternal and child health through Title V exceeds $3 billion annually. These funds reach virtually every county in the nation, serving an estimated 59 million individuals including 37 million children and 3 million pregnant women.

A 90-Year Federal-State Partnership

Title V was enacted as part of the original Social Security Act of 1935. At that time, infant and maternal mortality rates were alarmingly high, and public health infrastructure for mothers and children was virtually nonexistent outside major cities. Title V created the first dedicated federal funding stream for maternal and child health, establishing a federal-state partnership model that has endured for over nine decades.

The program was substantially restructured in 1981 when the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act consolidated seven categorical MCH programs into a single block grant, giving states significantly more flexibility in how they use funds. The 1989 amendments added the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirement and the 30/30/10 set-asides that remain central to Title V compliance today. The program's most recent major evolution came with the implementation of the national performance measurement framework, which shifted Title V from an input-focused program to one driven by population health outcomes.

Despite nearly a century of operation, Title V remains remarkably relevant. The program anchors state-level MCH infrastructure, funds direct services where gaps exist, supports workforce development, enables data collection and surveillance systems, and provides the organizational backbone for responding to emerging maternal and child health challenges — from the opioid crisis to maternal mortality to childhood lead exposure.

How Title V Funds Flow

Understanding the Title V distribution chain is essential for anyone working in state or local MCH programs. The flow of funds follows a clear hierarchy:

  • Federal level: MCHB at HRSA/HHS administers the block grant, sets national performance measures, reviews state applications, and provides technical assistance. MCHB also retains a portion of the appropriation for Special Projects of Regional and National Significance (SPRANS) and Community Integrated Service Systems (CISS) grants.
  • State level: Each state's designated Title V agency (typically a division of maternal and child health within the state health department) receives the federal allocation, provides the required state match, and implements programs through a combination of state-level activities and sub-grants to local entities
  • Local level: Local health departments, community health centers, hospitals, universities, and community-based organizations may receive Title V funds through state sub-grants or contracts to deliver direct services, conduct surveillance, or implement evidence-based interventions
  • Federal set-asides: Before the state formula allocation, MCHB retains approximately 15% of the appropriation for SPRANS, CISS, and other discretionary investments in MCH research, training, and demonstration projects

Six Population Health Domains

Title V organizes its work around six population health domains that define the scope of maternal and child health. Every state's Title V program must address needs across these domains, and the national performance measurement framework is structured around them:

DomainPopulation FocusExample Issues
Women/MaternalWomen of reproductive age, pregnant and postpartum womenMaternal mortality, preconception health, prenatal care access, postpartum depression
Perinatal/InfantInfants from birth through age 1Infant mortality, low birth weight, prematurity, breastfeeding, safe sleep
ChildChildren ages 1 through 11Developmental screening, childhood immunizations, injury prevention, oral health
AdolescentYouth ages 12 through 17Adolescent well-visits, substance use prevention, mental health, transition to adult care
CSHCNChildren and youth with special health care needsMedical home, care coordination, transition planning, family support, system integration
Cross-CuttingIssues spanning multiple populationsHealth equity, social determinants, oral health access, health insurance coverage, data capacity

The six-domain structure is not merely organizational. It directly shapes the performance measurement framework, the structure of the TVIS application and annual report, and the required set-aside allocations. States must demonstrate that their Title V program addresses needs across all six domains and must select National Performance Measures from at least five of the six.

Relationship to Healthy People 2030

Title V's National Outcome Measures (NOMs) are closely aligned with Healthy People 2030 objectives. This alignment is intentional — Title V is one of the primary federal vehicles for achieving the nation's maternal and child health goals. When states report on NOMs such as infant mortality rates, low birth weight percentages, or child mortality from injury, they are contributing to the national Healthy People dashboard. This connection underscores the public health significance of Title V data quality: accurate state-level reporting feeds into the national picture of MCH progress.

Who This Guide Is For

This Title V MCH Program Guide is written for practitioners — the people who manage, implement, and report on Title V programs:

  • State MCH Directors responsible for the overall Title V program, TVIS submissions, and federal compliance
  • Title V Program Managers who oversee specific population domains or program areas within the state MCH framework
  • Local Health Department MCH Staff who deliver Title V-funded services and report to the state on program activities
  • MCH Epidemiologists and Data Analysts responsible for performance measure data collection, analysis, and TVIS reporting
  • Grants Managers and Fiscal Officers who handle Title V budgeting, match calculations, MOE documentation, and financial reporting

What This Guide Covers

Each section of this guide addresses a specific aspect of Title V MCH management. Whether you are a new MCH director learning the program or a veteran grants manager preparing for a needs assessment cycle, these pages provide the detailed reference information you need. The guide covers the full lifecycle of Title V administration from eligibility and application through compliance, performance reporting, budget management, and common pitfalls.

Title V MCH at a Glance

CFDA Number93.994
Authorizing LegislationTitle V of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 701-710)
Federal AdministratorMaternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB), HRSA, HHS
Award TypeFormula block grant to 59 states and jurisdictions
FY2024 Appropriation~$815 million (federal share)
Total Investment (with match)~$3+ billion annually
Grant RecipientsState health agencies (designated Title V agency in each state)
Match Requirement$3 state/local for every $4 federal (3:4 ratio)
Set-Asides≥30% children/adolescents, ≥30% CSHCN, ≤10% administration
Performance Framework15 NOMs, 18 NPMs, state-selected ESMs
Reporting SystemTitle V Information System (TVIS)
Compliance FrameworkTitle V legislation, 2 CFR 200, MCHB guidance

Key Federal Resources

The Title V compliance landscape involves guidance from multiple levels. These are the primary sources you should bookmark:

  • MCHB/HRSA Title V website: Official program page with guidance documents, data reports, TVIS access, and technical assistance resources for state Title V programs
  • AMCHP (Association of Maternal & Child Health Programs): The national membership organization for state MCH programs, providing peer learning, policy analysis, and Title V implementation resources
  • National MCH Workforce Development Center: Training and technical assistance for state MCH leaders on performance management, quality improvement, and systems transformation
  • MCH Evidence Center: Curated evidence base of interventions and strategies aligned with Title V NPMs, supporting states in selecting evidence-based approaches

Title V and Companion Funding Streams

Title V does not operate in isolation. State MCH programs coordinate with and leverage multiple related funding streams to create a comprehensive system of care for mothers, children, and families. Common companion programs include:

  • Medicaid/CHIP: The largest payer for maternal and child health services. Title V legislation requires coordination with Medicaid, and most state Title V programs have formal interagency agreements with their Medicaid agency.
  • MIECHV (Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting): Federally funded evidence-based home visiting programs administered through HRSA, often co-located with Title V at the state level
  • WIC (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program): USDA-funded nutrition program for low-income pregnant and postpartum women, infants, and children up to age 5 — frequently co-located at MCH service delivery sites
  • Newborn Screening Programs: State-operated screening programs for metabolic, endocrine, hemoglobin, and other conditions, often partially funded through Title V
  • CDC Cooperative Agreements: Prevention programs for injury, lead poisoning, birth defects surveillance, and other MCH priorities that complement Title V investments

Managing multiple funding streams with different fiscal years, reporting requirements, and compliance frameworks is one of the central operational challenges for state MCH leadership. Understanding how Title V intersects with 2 CFR 200 requirements and Single Audit obligations is essential for maintaining compliance across your full portfolio.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Title V MCH Block Grant and who administers it?

The Title V Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant (CFDA 93.994) is a formula block grant authorized under Title V of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 701-710). It is administered by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) within the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. With an FY2024 federal appropriation of approximately $815 million, Title V is the oldest federal-state partnership for promoting and protecting the health of mothers, children, and families. Funds flow from MCHB to 59 states and jurisdictions based on a formula allocation.

How does Title V differ from competitive HRSA grants?

Title V is a formula block grant, not a competitive award. Every state and jurisdiction receives an annual allocation based on a statutory formula tied to the number of children in poverty and other factors. States do not compete against each other for funding through Grants.gov. Instead, they submit a combined application and annual report through the Title V Information System (TVIS), demonstrating how they will use and have used their allocation. This makes Title V more predictable than competitive grants like HRSA Section 330 or MCHB discretionary programs, but it requires states to meet ongoing legislative requirements including set-asides, Maintenance of Effort, and performance measure reporting.

What are the Title V set-aside requirements?

Title V legislation mandates three set-aside requirements that states must meet: at least 30% of federal funds must be spent on preventive and primary care services for children and adolescents, at least 30% must be spent on services for children with special health care needs (CSHCN), and no more than 10% may be used for administrative costs. These set-asides are tracked through the annual TVIS application/report and are among the most closely monitored compliance requirements in the program.

What is the Title V match requirement?

Title V requires a state match of $3 in state or local funds for every $4 in federal funds received. This is a 3:4 ratio, meaning the state must provide at least 75% of the federal allocation as matching funds. The match must come from non-federal sources and can include state appropriations, local government contributions, and certain in-kind resources. Additionally, states must maintain their historical level of spending on maternal and child health through the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirement, which is pegged to each state’s 1989 spending baseline.

What is the Title V Information System (TVIS)?

TVIS is the online system through which states submit their combined Title V application and annual report to MCHB. The application and report are integrated into a single document — each year, states report on the prior year’s performance while simultaneously applying for the coming year’s funding. TVIS captures state action plans, budget information, performance measure data (NOMs, NPMs, ESMs), needs assessment updates, and narrative descriptions of programs and strategies. All 59 states and jurisdictions use TVIS, making it the central repository for Title V program data nationwide.

What performance measures does Title V use?

Title V uses a three-tier performance measurement framework: 15 National Outcome Measures (NOMs) that track population-level health outcomes such as infant mortality and low birth weight rates, 18 National Performance Measures (NPMs) that states select from to focus their improvement efforts, and Evidence-based/informed Strategy Measures (ESMs) that states define to track implementation of specific strategies tied to their selected NPMs. States must select a minimum of 8 NPMs spanning at least 5 of the 6 population health domains, and develop at least one ESM for each selected NPM.

Can local health departments receive Title V funds directly?

Local health departments do not receive Title V funds directly from the federal government. Title V is a state-administered block grant, meaning MCHB awards funds to the designated Title V agency in each state (typically the state health department or a division within it). The state Title V agency then determines how to distribute funds within the state, which often includes sub-granting or contracting with local health departments, community-based organizations, and other entities. The specific distribution model varies significantly by state — some states pass substantial funding to local agencies, while others operate programs primarily at the state level.

Stay current on Title V MCH funding and compliance

Get notified about MCH Block Grant allocations, MCHB guidance updates, and performance measure changes affecting state and local health departments — free forever.